Challenges to the Sustainability of the U.S. Public Cord Blood System

A report published by the RAND Corporation

A point of view


We asked one of our AABB members, Karen Ballen, MD, who is also the chair of the cord blood advisory committee for the National Marrow Donor Program, to give her point of view on the RAND report. Read Dr. Ballen’s responses to a few questions.*

Background:

Purpose of report described by RAND (www.rand.org)
To fill knowledge gaps by:

  • Describing the existing public Cord Blood Bank (CBB) system
  • Assessing current trends and economic relationships from perspectives of key stakeholders in the public CBB system
  • Providing recommendations to improve the economic sustainability of the public CBB system

Question:  Of the key findings, what stood out to you?
Karen Ballen (response):

  1. Cord Blood serves a critical need for a diverse group of patients, but public cord blood banking is expensive.
  2. The increase in haploidentical transplantation has led to a decrease in cord blood transplants. An ongoing randomized study (CTN 1101) compares cord blood to haplo transplant.

Question:  What are the implications of the findings?
Karen Ballen (response):

  1. There continues to be a need for public cord blood banks, but certain changes may be needed.
  2. Cord blood banks may need to consolidate or make contingency plans.


Question: The RAND report listed a few key recommendations. Could you briefly comment on them?
Karen Ballen (response):

  1. Increase diversity of national inventory. There need to be more incentives to encourage banks to collect, high quality minority cord blood units. This means that 80-90% of units collected from certain populations will be discarded due to low cell dose.
  2. Standardize and consistently fund the NCBI contracts. This is important, not to decrease competition, but because best practices cannot always be shared in there are different, competitive models.
  3. Prepare contingency plans. There should be plans for banks to consolidate or partner with industry as needed.

Question: How do you see the future of cord blood banking?
KarenBallen (response):

The Rand report emphasizes the importance of public cord blood banks as providing an essential resource to a diverse group of patients. I think we will see newer applications of cord blood, such as regenerative medicine that may help to energize the field. 

*These statements represent the member’s view and not necessarily those of AABB.